I have received a number of requests for demonstration code
on how to perform a power analysis using simulation in R. I have already demonstrated howto do this in Stata but lacked the easy to use Stata command “simulate”
that I preferred. However, in a recent
post I have written up a command very
similar to simulate in R called SimpleSim.

This command takes is capable of taking a vector of parameters and feeding them into a function which returns a vector of results. The results are turned into a table which can be used to show the rates of type 1 and type 2 error given a particular sample size and underlying effect.

Example:

Let's imagine that we are interested in testing the effect that bednet usage has on the rate of infection of malaria. We are concerned that the decision to purchase and use bednets might endogenous as a result of those more likely to come down with malaria being more prone to seeing bednets as a valuable investment.

So, in response we are going to design an randomized control trial (RCT) in which we either supply fully paid bednet coupons or half discounted coupons each to different thirds of the population leaving the remaining third as a control. We are concerned that if supply the bednets at no cost then the recipients will not value them so that is why we give coupons that only reduce the cost of the bednets by 1/2.

After distributing the coupons, we would like to use the random distribution of the coupons as an instrument for use of a bednet. Ultimately we would like to do two levels of analysis.

1. Using instrumental variables (IV) to see how effective bednets are at preventing Malaria in an active population. This is actually an interesting question because often there is imperfect compliance because few individuals spend all of the hours at dusk and dawn under a bednet. In this case I should use an estimator that takes the form of the first stage being a binary regressor followed by a second stage binary regressor. However, since linear models seem to be pretty good at approximating average partial effects I am just going to use a IV estimator.

2. Using ordinary least squares (OLS) we would like to see how effective each of the coupon programs are at increasing use of bednets within the homes.

require("AER") # We will use the ivreg function later

Example:

Let's imagine that we are interested in testing the effect that bednet usage has on the rate of infection of malaria. We are concerned that the decision to purchase and use bednets might endogenous as a result of those more likely to come down with malaria being more prone to seeing bednets as a valuable investment.

So, in response we are going to design an randomized control trial (RCT) in which we either supply fully paid bednet coupons or half discounted coupons each to different thirds of the population leaving the remaining third as a control. We are concerned that if supply the bednets at no cost then the recipients will not value them so that is why we give coupons that only reduce the cost of the bednets by 1/2.

After distributing the coupons, we would like to use the random distribution of the coupons as an instrument for use of a bednet. Ultimately we would like to do two levels of analysis.

1. Using instrumental variables (IV) to see how effective bednets are at preventing Malaria in an active population. This is actually an interesting question because often there is imperfect compliance because few individuals spend all of the hours at dusk and dawn under a bednet. In this case I should use an estimator that takes the form of the first stage being a binary regressor followed by a second stage binary regressor. However, since linear models seem to be pretty good at approximating average partial effects I am just going to use a IV estimator.

2. Using ordinary least squares (OLS) we would like to see how effective each of the coupon programs are at increasing use of bednets within the homes.

require("AER") # We will use the ivreg function later

# We define a function that both simulates a population and estimates # results and returns and returns the results. MalariaIV <- function( nsim = 100, npop = 1000, # Define the sampling population treat0 = 1/3, # Define the proportion which is control treat1 = 1/3, # Define the proportion which is treated with free bednets treat2 = 1/3, # Define the proportion which is treated with 50% cost t0comp = .05, # Bednet useage among control group t1comp = .85, # Bednet useage if recieving free net t2comp = .5 , # Bednet useage if recieving 50% cost malariaRT = .85,# Rate of getting malaria without bednet netRT = .45, # Rate of getting malaria with bednet Tdetect = 1, # Likihood of detecting malaria if present Fdetect = 0, # Likihood of detecting malaria if not present alpha = .05 # The alpha level that a p-value must be below ) { # Define how the function works # First, define a vector to store results pvalues <- NULL # for (i in 1:nsim) { # Repeat the simulation a number of times # Generate the population by technology useage simdata <- data.frame( control=c(rep(1,npop*treat0),rep(0,npop*treat1), rep(0,npop*treat2)), treat1 =c(rep(0,npop*treat0),rep(1,npop*treat1), rep(0,npop*treat2)), treat2 =c(rep(0,npop*treat0),rep(0,npop*treat1), rep(1,npop*treat2))) # Calculate the actual population generated (should be 999 in this case) npeople <- nrow(simdata) # Generate the rate of bednet usage. simdata$bednet <- simdata$control*rbinom(npeople,1,t0comp) + # Bednet usage control simdata$treat1 *rbinom(npeople,1,t1comp) + # Free simdata$treat2 *rbinom(npeople,1,t2comp) # 50% cost # Now let's generate the rate of malaria simdata$malaria <- (simdata$bednet==0)*rbinom(npeople,1,malariaRT)+ (simdata$bednet==1)*rbinom(npeople,1,netRT) # Finally generate the rate of malaria detection as a function # of true parasite levels. simdata$mdetect <- (simdata$malaria==0)*rbinom(npeople,1,Fdetect)+ # False detection (simdata$malaria==1)*rbinom(npeople,1,Tdetect) # True detection # Time to do our simple estimation of the effect of treatment on bednet use lmcoef <- summary(lm(bednet~treat1+treat2,data=simdata))$coefficients # Now let's try the 2SLS to estimate the effect of bednets on contraction # of malaria. ivregest <- ivreg(mdetect~bednet | treat1+treat2, data=simdata) ivregcoef <- summary(ivregest)$coefficients # Save the rejection of the null rates pvalues <- rbind(pvalues,c(treat1=lmcoef[2,4]<alpha, treat2=lmcoef[3,4]<alpha, iv=ivregcoef[2,4]<alpha)) } # Calculate the mean rejection rate for each coefficient. apply(pvalues,2,mean) } MalariaIV() # Running it once we can see that we get a single set of results # where we easily reject the null. However, we want to know # what happens when bednets are not so effective or malaria is harder # to detect. We can modify the parameters fed into the model to test # these questions manually or we could use the SimpleSim function from # a previous post. SimpleSim(fun=MalariaIV, npop=c(100,1000), t0comp=c(.05,.25), t1comp=c(.5,.75), t2comp=c(.25,.5), malariaRT=c(.85,.5), netRT=c(.75,.45), Tdetect=c(1,.7), Fdetect=c(0,.3), alpha=.05, nsim=10) # This could take a little while to run since there are 256 combinations # to try and each of them will be run 10 times. # The above command gives back lots of data but it is not always very easy # to understand in a matrix form. It is often easier to just vary one # paramter at a time. sample.size <- SimpleSim(fun=MalariaIV, npop=c(500,1000*1:10), t0comp=c(.25), t1comp=c(.75), t2comp=c(.375), malariaRT=c(.5), netRT=c(.35), Tdetect=c(.8), Fdetect=c(.2), alpha=.05, nsim=200) # Looking at just sample size require(ggplot2) # Save the results to single long data format to be useable by ggplot2 results <- with(sample.size, data.frame(reject = as.numeric( c(iv,treat2,treat1)), id=rep(c("iv","treat2","treat1"), each=length(npop)), npop)) p <- ggplot(results, aes(npop, reject)) # Normally a 80% detection rate is the minimum rejection rate needed # to justify a study. p + geom_point(aes(colour =id)) + geom_line(aes(group=id)) + geom_hline(yintercept = .8)

# Thus we want to ensure our study has at least 5000 participants. # I think there might be some additional considerations for the # number of participants required to ensure that there is no # false rejection of the null. However, I am no expert on Power # Analysis so this is what I know.

## No comments:

## Post a Comment